• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer
Palmer | Lopez

Palmer | Lopez

Free Initial Consultation

(813) 506-5651

  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
        • Medical Injury
        • Hospital Negligence
        • Catastrophic Injuries
        • Medication Errors
        • Cancer Misdiagnosis
        • Wrongful Death
        • Physician Negligence
        • Personal Injury
        • Car Accidents
        • Motorcycle Accident
        • Truck Accidents
        • Slip and Fall
        • Premises Liability
        • View all
  • Injury Guide
  • Results
  • Reviews
  • Contact
Home » Chirillo v. Granicz Appeal Raises Difficult Questions About Physician Duty in an Outpatient Setting

Chirillo v. Granicz Appeal Raises Difficult Questions About Physician Duty in an Outpatient Setting

November 30, 2017

Doctor Malpractice

In any medical malpractice case, it is necessary for the plaintiff to establish that the physician had a duty to care for the patient and also that the physician did not uphold the standard of care. This is especially difficult in the field of psychiatry, where a substantial amount of physicians’ information about the improvement or worsening of a patient’s symptoms comes from patients reporting on their emotional state. In an inpatient setting, psychiatrists and hospital staff can keep observe patients’ behavior on a constant basis, which can help them determine how well their treatments are working, but in an outpatient setting, this is much more of a challenge. In the case of Chirillo v. Granicz, the Florida Supreme Court issued a decision regarding a physician’s duties toward a psychiatric patient being treated in an outpatient setting.

Facts of Chirillo v. Granicz 

The patient was receiving treatment for depression; all of her treatment took place on an outpatient basis. At first, the doctor prescribed Prozac, an antidepressant. After taking Prozac for a while, the patient requested to have her prescription changed to a different drug, because of non-psychiatric side effects of Prozac. The physician then prescribed a different antidepressant, Effexor, for the patient. After some time taking Effexor, the patient told the physician that she wished to stop taking the drug, because she felt that she no longer needed it. The patient died by suicide shortly after stopping Effexor.

Could the Psychiatrist Have Prevented the Patient’s Suicide? 

The legal precedent, as set out in the Lawlor v. Orlando ruling, is that physicians do not have a duty to prevent a patient’s self-harm, because such self-harm is usually unforeseeable. When physicians determine, based on a patient’s behavior or expression of suicidal thoughts, that the patient is at high risk of self-harm, they intervene, whether by changing the patient’s medication or, if necessary, referring the patient to inpatient care.

Thus, it is a bit surprising that the court’s decision contained such general language about a physician’s duty to prevent self-harm among non-hospitalized patients. Jacqueline Granicz seems to have given no indication of her suicidal thoughts. Some antidepressants do have a discontinuation syndrome, in which patients have worsening symptoms of depression for the first few weeks after stopping the drug. One could argue that the physician should have advised Granicz more strongly against abruptly discontinuing Effexor.

Reach Out to Us Today for Help 

Psychiatrists have the same duties toward their patients as other physicians do. Contact Palmer | Lopez in Tampa, Florida if you have questions about possible psychiatric malpractice. We are eager to provide you with further information, and, if you have a case, assist you throughout each step of the process.

Resource:

blogs.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2016/12/12/outpatient-psychiatric-treatment-the-duty-to-prevent-patient-suicide/

Filed Under: Medical Malpractice

Badges - The National Top 100 Trial Lawyers, Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum, Best Lawyers
Badges - Super Lawyers, National Top 40 Under 40 Trial Lawyers, Million Dollar Advocates Forum

Footer

up arrow icon

Fill out the information to have a member of the legal team at Palmer | Lopez contact you about your potential claim. Your consultation is free and confidential, and there is never any fee if we don’t recover for you.

If you reside in the Tampa area and need skilled legal representation, our Tampa injury attorneys are available to help. 

Tampa

17543 Darby Ln
Tampa, FL 33558

3001 N Rocky Point Dr E, Suite 200
Tampa, FL 33607

For residents in need of expert injury representation, our Brandon personal injury and medical malpractice attorneys are here to help.

Brandon

522 Oakfield Dr
Brandon, FL 33511

For those in St. Petersburg seeking legal representation, our St. Petersburg accident attorneys are ready to serve you. 

St. Petersburg

360 Central Ave, Suite 800
St. Petersburg, FL 33701

Reach us from anywhere in FL

Call (813) 506-5651

Copyright © 2026 · The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written permission from palmerinjurylaw.com. Disclaimer.

Lawyer Marketing & Web Design by SEO Advantage, Inc.  |  Blog